Any bets when bullets will fly at Caledonia? Terrible thought you say, maybe so?
The real hilarious moments in this whole debate are the property owners that feel guilty enough to side with the natives. I do wonder how they would feel surrendering their home and property? I'm sure if things continue on this haphazard course they may get their chance to be altruistic and merrily take one for their country.
We can debate the virtue of peace , and being a “victim” till the cows come home, but what will change? McGuinty and his back from the living dead minion are only out to appease those that can’t exist without a hand up.The property owners affected?Well sorry for your luck patience it seems is a liberal virtue and a “Canadian Value”.When it comes to a liberal government “sucking” on a minorities schlong that’s all their good for these days whether it’s terrorist organizations or natives in Caledonia. Wrong is right- right is wrong thats their motto.
Don’t make waves god forbid, peace and goodwill and all that crap. This wouldn’t be so bad if the fact it would all end for a good amount of time, and everyone basically existed toiling on different paths headed in the same direction , and respected each other for that.
Trouble is “spare the rod spoil the child” rings true in this case and for generations to come.
However colour trumps logic, good sense, and the heart of the matter. Not to the “white trash” (me included) we seem to think the natives have it in them to rise up and make something of themselves .Governments don’t and either do some Indians themselves.
So the residents of Caledonia are at impasse, how many weeks now have they been asked to eat shit? They don’t really have a choice when it comes to the laws of the land when they are being ignored.
I know…. I know the natives have been eating shit for 200 years, one difference though all it takes for them to change their diet of “crap” is to hold their own spoon , get out of their imaginary high chair and feed themselves a healthy dose of pride. The “whitey’s” either sit back and continue choking on McGuinty’s liberal B.S. or start making some noise like they did this morning. Of course to some that makes them no better than the Indians, but I say they are standing up for all of us that don’t want to be waiting for the next episode of a “Land Claim Near You” brought to you by your friendly neighbourhood peacenik liberal. That would sell YOUR farm for a little momentary peace. After all you kids hard work can cover the next land claim down the road ten years from now.
That’s progress heh? Do we wait for the (entitled) natives to get it? Wait for governments to give it all away , at any cost even for the wrong reasons. When “private property” becomes no more than a native bargaining chip and governments spit on those that own it shouldn’t more than patience be expected by land owners and residents affected by whats happening. I’m not suggesting bullets need to fly, but I certainly would understand anyone who has lived and paid taxes on their property being a very loud pain in the ass to those that want to take it . Especially when the law has been abandoned and their security and maybe the one reason they charge on every Monday comes into question by people of a different race and colour, and those in government that exist in their own Utopia , the working man never has time to fathom because its a fantasy in their world.
Maybe peace isn’t going to cut it anymore? Maybe a gigantic mass of non-natives (stupid word) whites rolling silently at a steady pace across Caledonia's no mans lands in a clear direction will send the message to whiners that really on a grand scale are worthless (they seem to think so) along with the governments that forget diapers are for babies that they are not going to stand for actions that bring life as they know it to a stand still…... after all we all are paying our dues to life an honest life in this country, and don't ask for much.
Choices are becoming fewer and far between to the working masses and when does the price become to high to pay for whats delivered? Maybe its time the signal enough is sent…….. LOUDLY to counter Liberal inaction, other than their sale of our values that have built this country and once where held in esteem by all parties in government once upon a time.
We are watching the citizens of Caledonia being spoon fed shit and they are saying it is , rightly so.Even when the government thinks its apple pie. So far they have been just holding their nose.
Do you want to wait for your mouth full ?
H/t - Kate
H/t - Darcey
Tuesday, May 23, 2006
Wednesday, May 17, 2006
Wake up Ontario !!
It seems when one reads between the lines, it is not hard to see when it comes to moments of the self- sufficiency, honesty, and enjoyment of freedoms that benefit more than just ones self. There is a liberal, or a socialist waiting to tread on rural values and the freedom that allows one to enjoy freedom to its fullest honest intent, and experience life in an honest natural way.
Why? Simply because they fear our clarity, our sense of freedom, and the value we put on being “chainless”. B.S. isn’t something we hold dear especially when it comes from government, even if apathy has become something to be desired. Still though there is in many the feeling that something is very wrong with democracy.We wonder when we slipped from being the customer who was always right, to the customer that’s told what they want to hear, then never waited on with concrete answers. People that think for themselves stand in the way of governments, which would much rather control rather than govern with integrity
The ability to loudly call our government to task simmers within many who cast a blind glance to the reasons for the way things are. All that’s needed is those that bravely stand up to the truth that exists today especially in this province to be heard by all. A better province and a better country is at hand. The trouble is in order for this to be so, modern liberals and socialists need to be driven back from where they came. The cesspool of meddling intellect.
We have in this province Bruce Montague , Randy Hillier, Shawn Carmicheal just to name a few that come to mind. The things they have in common are they are rural , out spoken , brazen , believe in freedom( so much they will sacrifice their own), less government and are seen by the liberals in this province as subjects (make subservient; force to submit or subdue) that should be seen not heard - click the links.
Shame sadly goes missing in those of us that fail to grasp the vindictiveness that lies within these urban meddlers who feed from bottomless troughs, and truly see themselves as our saviours who limit our freedoms with a smile. Just look at this latest triumphant brain fart spouted forth like its some gift by Ontario’s holier than thou health minister.
Thankfully he quickly back-pedalled only to reveal how haphazardly laws come to be if only to demonstrate ones “use” yet ironically demonstrates how useless they really are when they fail to consider an individuals freedom in the first place.
Sadly something liberals and socialists fail to grasp as a natural function of governing, as they would rather rule, and spread self prescribed misery, lies, and corruption like the plague.
Why? Simply because they fear our clarity, our sense of freedom, and the value we put on being “chainless”. B.S. isn’t something we hold dear especially when it comes from government, even if apathy has become something to be desired. Still though there is in many the feeling that something is very wrong with democracy.We wonder when we slipped from being the customer who was always right, to the customer that’s told what they want to hear, then never waited on with concrete answers. People that think for themselves stand in the way of governments, which would much rather control rather than govern with integrity
The ability to loudly call our government to task simmers within many who cast a blind glance to the reasons for the way things are. All that’s needed is those that bravely stand up to the truth that exists today especially in this province to be heard by all. A better province and a better country is at hand. The trouble is in order for this to be so, modern liberals and socialists need to be driven back from where they came. The cesspool of meddling intellect.
We have in this province Bruce Montague , Randy Hillier, Shawn Carmicheal just to name a few that come to mind. The things they have in common are they are rural , out spoken , brazen , believe in freedom( so much they will sacrifice their own), less government and are seen by the liberals in this province as subjects (make subservient; force to submit or subdue) that should be seen not heard - click the links.
Shame sadly goes missing in those of us that fail to grasp the vindictiveness that lies within these urban meddlers who feed from bottomless troughs, and truly see themselves as our saviours who limit our freedoms with a smile. Just look at this latest triumphant brain fart spouted forth like its some gift by Ontario’s holier than thou health minister.
Thankfully he quickly back-pedalled only to reveal how haphazardly laws come to be if only to demonstrate ones “use” yet ironically demonstrates how useless they really are when they fail to consider an individuals freedom in the first place.
Sadly something liberals and socialists fail to grasp as a natural function of governing, as they would rather rule, and spread self prescribed misery, lies, and corruption like the plague.
Monday, May 08, 2006
Heres a heartwarming story
"This appears to be an act of official frustration, not one of those cosmetic attempts to placate the right. The Minutemen, denounced as vigilantes by President Bush but greatly respected in the state, are now building a fence on private land along the Mexican border. They are going national too, with chapters popping up in Virginia and elsewhere" (link)
I know as a Canadian I felt alarmed seeing thousands of protesters crying to be let into the US "scot free", so I can only imagine how those that live in the states feel seeing whats going down right under their noses.
Its great seeing FREE citizens stand up for themselves, and do whats right.
I know as a Canadian I felt alarmed seeing thousands of protesters crying to be let into the US "scot free", so I can only imagine how those that live in the states feel seeing whats going down right under their noses.
Its great seeing FREE citizens stand up for themselves, and do whats right.
Thursday, May 04, 2006
More Liberal supplied B.S.
As things stand in society today, I wonder how many people have experienced situations where one parent takes a stand, and tries to correct a childs bad behaviour, and the other undermines their effort completely, derailing the whole process of raising a child responsibly. I've seen it and experienced it personally though not in a very damaging way, never the less some people don't see the big picture - little Johnny and Jane grow and will they have enough the brain power, backbone and moral acuity to be good people of value to themselves and society?
Parents have instilled these values for decades, not perfectly but they did their best, some better than others, however a parent could come up alittle short for there where adults that wanted children to be good people that knew the sence of responsibilty before the "virtue" of an excuse.
Then modern liberalism came along all touchy-feely, wielding a degree , and a hate on for tradition. Shame for an earned action, to a liberal is debilitating to the soul , rather than a hereditary marker not to do that again. Time outs , and he or she doesn't know any better replaced, I know your smarter than that, brighten up.
At one time I think the majority seen hope and a potential for goodness in a childs eyes, and knew to coddle a sence of idle individualism in a child before they showed signs of getting the hierarchy of life when it came to family , personal growth, and how you respected others in your community was a sure fire way to ruin the child, take the temper out of their responsibilty to the world around them , and basically raise a problem instead of a grown responsible adult that could think their way into old age and actually acquire honest self discovered wisdom while grasping reality clearly by the horns and dealing with it.
That was the instinctive wisdom of the day imparted thru generations of families by parents that where respected by governments, that valued the same principles that where planted like seeds to grow in an honest and fertile mind of young human beings that where allowed to grow in a healthy nurturing enviorment by loving caring parents and their families that seen raising a good person as a virtue, not a pain but a requirement of being a parent, adult, and a member of a community.
Certainly it all wasn't perfect some fell thru the cracks , and fell hard with no excuses(at least valuable ones) there to catch them and give them the easy way out. They either got the point or didn't and slept in the bed they made, with not many willing to reward the irresponsibility of the individual. Life and its keen hard realities at one time made great teaching aids that didn't cost a cent. Growing to adulthood was just that a natural evolution expected and demanded by society, and delivered upon by duteous parents.
Then came the socialists and liberals one in the same, and slowly over the years wrongs where made right even though wrong and right over time in more ways than not in reality, had the same affect to the real victims and the society they lived in, as consequence and personal responsibilty by the perpetrators dwindled. Tolerance became a buzz word and a muzzle for liberals in defence of their instinctive visions of the utopia only they can deliver, on the wings of progress.Served on a government platter with conditions in fine print. Canadians willingly surrendered to government supplied faux values,drunk on the liberal virtue of self sacrifice for exactly that yourself .Little did they know then how upside down our country was(is) in danger of becoming.
Today more are maybe questioning the validity of their independance while chasing government carrots on a string, or ceding to the price of government sponsored social engineering ,that only values government intervention in as many aspects of an individuals life, that it can slink into , even raising our children, and worst of all undermining and hijacking time honored parental values.
The hypocrisy of the left and its failures to date can be clearly seen in this stupid (you can insert what you like) statement by Carolyn Bennet on the conservatives "failure" to play pied piper, in their budget.
If conservatisim is so detrimental and liberalism such the opposite when it comes to child developement? Why then over time as Canada became liberalised have jails not disappeared from our landscape entirely, why do gangs in our cities incite wars that harm the innocent, why do mothers leave month old children to starve in their cribs, why do social agencies scramble to do everything from feed children breakfast, to find them a home for a weekend. Is this the utopia Canadians value? It certainly is what liberals like Carrol Bennet defend.
The truth of the matter and real crime of liberals and their ilk, is their abilty and need to control whats said and whats thought to hide what they know - the fallacy in their ideology . An idealogy that can only exsist when there is a good deal of guilt and denial present in the masses that roll over and cede control of their lives and whats important to them to changelings.
What kind of parent sees themselves as unable to instill values that will carry the day for their child? One would have to logically say either a liberal one, or a parent that just doesn't really care. On second thought they are one in the same.
Proud to be Canadian has some great info.
Bloggers fighting Carolyn Bennett
Parents have instilled these values for decades, not perfectly but they did their best, some better than others, however a parent could come up alittle short for there where adults that wanted children to be good people that knew the sence of responsibilty before the "virtue" of an excuse.
Then modern liberalism came along all touchy-feely, wielding a degree , and a hate on for tradition. Shame for an earned action, to a liberal is debilitating to the soul , rather than a hereditary marker not to do that again. Time outs , and he or she doesn't know any better replaced, I know your smarter than that, brighten up.
At one time I think the majority seen hope and a potential for goodness in a childs eyes, and knew to coddle a sence of idle individualism in a child before they showed signs of getting the hierarchy of life when it came to family , personal growth, and how you respected others in your community was a sure fire way to ruin the child, take the temper out of their responsibilty to the world around them , and basically raise a problem instead of a grown responsible adult that could think their way into old age and actually acquire honest self discovered wisdom while grasping reality clearly by the horns and dealing with it.
That was the instinctive wisdom of the day imparted thru generations of families by parents that where respected by governments, that valued the same principles that where planted like seeds to grow in an honest and fertile mind of young human beings that where allowed to grow in a healthy nurturing enviorment by loving caring parents and their families that seen raising a good person as a virtue, not a pain but a requirement of being a parent, adult, and a member of a community.
Certainly it all wasn't perfect some fell thru the cracks , and fell hard with no excuses(at least valuable ones) there to catch them and give them the easy way out. They either got the point or didn't and slept in the bed they made, with not many willing to reward the irresponsibility of the individual. Life and its keen hard realities at one time made great teaching aids that didn't cost a cent. Growing to adulthood was just that a natural evolution expected and demanded by society, and delivered upon by duteous parents.
Then came the socialists and liberals one in the same, and slowly over the years wrongs where made right even though wrong and right over time in more ways than not in reality, had the same affect to the real victims and the society they lived in, as consequence and personal responsibilty by the perpetrators dwindled. Tolerance became a buzz word and a muzzle for liberals in defence of their instinctive visions of the utopia only they can deliver, on the wings of progress.Served on a government platter with conditions in fine print. Canadians willingly surrendered to government supplied faux values,drunk on the liberal virtue of self sacrifice for exactly that yourself .Little did they know then how upside down our country was(is) in danger of becoming.
Today more are maybe questioning the validity of their independance while chasing government carrots on a string, or ceding to the price of government sponsored social engineering ,that only values government intervention in as many aspects of an individuals life, that it can slink into , even raising our children, and worst of all undermining and hijacking time honored parental values.
The hypocrisy of the left and its failures to date can be clearly seen in this stupid (you can insert what you like) statement by Carolyn Bennet on the conservatives "failure" to play pied piper, in their budget.
If conservatisim is so detrimental and liberalism such the opposite when it comes to child developement? Why then over time as Canada became liberalised have jails not disappeared from our landscape entirely, why do gangs in our cities incite wars that harm the innocent, why do mothers leave month old children to starve in their cribs, why do social agencies scramble to do everything from feed children breakfast, to find them a home for a weekend. Is this the utopia Canadians value? It certainly is what liberals like Carrol Bennet defend.
The truth of the matter and real crime of liberals and their ilk, is their abilty and need to control whats said and whats thought to hide what they know - the fallacy in their ideology . An idealogy that can only exsist when there is a good deal of guilt and denial present in the masses that roll over and cede control of their lives and whats important to them to changelings.
What kind of parent sees themselves as unable to instill values that will carry the day for their child? One would have to logically say either a liberal one, or a parent that just doesn't really care. On second thought they are one in the same.
Proud to be Canadian has some great info.
Bloggers fighting Carolyn Bennett
Monday, May 01, 2006
I guess we are the "Israeli's"
I stopped by Dust My broom to check out whats new in regards to the stand off at Caledonia, and I couldn't believe what I was reading. One always wonders about the self serving stabilty of a liberal minion but it articles like these that definately tender the fact the bats have escaped the bellfry.
Certainly perceptions from either side are deeply rooted, but it isn't hard to spot a "perfect" negotiator and their abilty to play boths sides of the fence. I will guess though Peterson is negotiating while holding sympathy close to his haemorrhaging heart for the "Palestinians" (natives) and views with disdain the wall (intolerance) we "Israeli's"have built that stymies any attempt at self reliance by Native Americans.
For some reason the feeling of guilt, protesting natives would love to saddle us with doesn't register on my guilt scale and its a pretty sensitive one at that.
Peterson may have charisma, but as far as I can tell his sweet talk and wit in reality is hidden by a government brinks truck and a blank cheque that he holds out like a carrot, and tries to remove right and wrong from the equation with money.
Where will the lasting peace be found? Not in an appeaser holding a government purse, because sweet talk , and money only last so long. Sooner or later those the excell at being lazy asses will need another fix.
Maybe Peterson should note many non-natives don't want barriers when it comes to employment in the least when it comes to natives or any other "grandfathered victim". Non-natives would rather or at least hope and welcome more natives and those like them that take the time to pick themselves up and do something honest with their lives instead of waiting for nice weather to stage a protest, and be somebody with a book of matches, guess we are lucky they haven't strapped pipe bombs to themselves, and maybe they are lucky we haven't clanked thru Caledonia with one of these
Certainly perceptions from either side are deeply rooted, but it isn't hard to spot a "perfect" negotiator and their abilty to play boths sides of the fence. I will guess though Peterson is negotiating while holding sympathy close to his haemorrhaging heart for the "Palestinians" (natives) and views with disdain the wall (intolerance) we "Israeli's"have built that stymies any attempt at self reliance by Native Americans.
For some reason the feeling of guilt, protesting natives would love to saddle us with doesn't register on my guilt scale and its a pretty sensitive one at that.
Peterson may have charisma, but as far as I can tell his sweet talk and wit in reality is hidden by a government brinks truck and a blank cheque that he holds out like a carrot, and tries to remove right and wrong from the equation with money.
Where will the lasting peace be found? Not in an appeaser holding a government purse, because sweet talk , and money only last so long. Sooner or later those the excell at being lazy asses will need another fix.
Maybe Peterson should note many non-natives don't want barriers when it comes to employment in the least when it comes to natives or any other "grandfathered victim". Non-natives would rather or at least hope and welcome more natives and those like them that take the time to pick themselves up and do something honest with their lives instead of waiting for nice weather to stage a protest, and be somebody with a book of matches, guess we are lucky they haven't strapped pipe bombs to themselves, and maybe they are lucky we haven't clanked thru Caledonia with one of these
Tuesday, April 25, 2006
Just another disgrace when it comes to hard work and honesty
If you own land, run a business , or expect to earn an honest living minding your own matters, while being responsible for yourself and your family. Make sure you don't live near a reserve.
Now before I go on I have the upmost respect for anyone of any color that works for a living, pays taxes, or those that don't but live with who they are within the circumstances they find themselves with honorable intentions that don't chant"I AM A VICTIM" anytime they see a chance.
Hearing and reading about what is transpiring in Caledonia my blood gets to boiling.
Nice to see a Mayor call a spade a spade when she said the local businesses of Caledonia where hurting,and they didn't have the benefit of an automatic paycheck. Feathers of course got ruffled; the truth does hurt.
Why do we let natives hold us hostage? Do they not possess brains, two hands, and feet like the rest of humanity? Why do liberals only recognize tradition when it comes to the color of someones skin as long as it isn't white? Isn't respect earned, and when was the last time you seen a native, someone on welfare, a stoned bum, or for that matter a politician earn it?
Something all the above have in common is their perception that they are entitled to respect they never earned in the first place. Maybe at one point in time, but I fail to see how residents of Canada, Ontario, least of all Caledonia even owe certain natives "the time of day" when they seem to have forgotten how to look for themselves. I don't blame anyone being pissed about that fact one bit.
"Luckily" we have McGuinty,tazers and pepper spray. Which by the way now are useless as the police said they will not raid the occupants camp again after a previous raid failed, and politicians of the liberal socialist variety feigned horror at the fact violence reared its ugly head and their backbones reverted back to jelly , how nice and touching.
I know how self reliant tax paying residents feel, I lived near Ipperwash and witnessed the total insanity of political correctness, and how the guilty cower behind its perception by those too weak to set the truth free.
Taxpayers and the truth carry the burdon natives have forgotten for its easier to be a pain use your color or your blood line to gain favor, of course it easier to take the time to be a pain when you know a cheques coming that isn't dependent, on your job performance, character, hours worked or personal worth to those that pay you.
The incidents like those at Ipperwash, Oka, and now Caledonia when the victims , those victims of their own stupidity and slothfulness are being the pain and holding communities, land owners, and buisnesses hostage.While government diddy daddles with sugar coated nicety, so natives can find or be handed their worth from somebody other than themselves.While others that know their worth no matter their color, or race while working to forge their own place and worth .Even while living with the setbacks and dishonesty ripe in todays world, and they themselves fall victim to their own stupidity also. The difference being they have learned from their mistakes and even then many never get the respect they have earned by being stand up individuals in this country while moving on productively with a smile on their face , instead of becoming the dead weight many native protesters like to be, while receiving our tax dollars.
Its time to say sorry for your luck, heres your kick at self government, our laws are your laws when it comes to buisness administration, taxes, paying for your legal fees etc etc....... their isn't much room for negotiation but heres the kick at the can you want, just like "everyone else" (mostly everybody) otherwise live with your selfish stupidity, like its nature intends.
All you have to do is try and quit expecting something from the rest of Canada the war of 1812 was long ago, and our veterans that fought in WW 2 get sold short so quit whining start making the change into a nation the earns respect, not searching for it like a whining pup searching for a teat.
I don't owe you anything, my children certainly don't, nor do my neighbours, only the respect you have HONESTLY EARNED no matter your creed, color or religion.
Oh and only the guilty need feel offended.
Update : One could only" hope
" (the perception of the indian problem is false though)
Now before I go on I have the upmost respect for anyone of any color that works for a living, pays taxes, or those that don't but live with who they are within the circumstances they find themselves with honorable intentions that don't chant"I AM A VICTIM" anytime they see a chance.
Hearing and reading about what is transpiring in Caledonia my blood gets to boiling.
Nice to see a Mayor call a spade a spade when she said the local businesses of Caledonia where hurting,and they didn't have the benefit of an automatic paycheck. Feathers of course got ruffled; the truth does hurt.
Why do we let natives hold us hostage? Do they not possess brains, two hands, and feet like the rest of humanity? Why do liberals only recognize tradition when it comes to the color of someones skin as long as it isn't white? Isn't respect earned, and when was the last time you seen a native, someone on welfare, a stoned bum, or for that matter a politician earn it?
Something all the above have in common is their perception that they are entitled to respect they never earned in the first place. Maybe at one point in time, but I fail to see how residents of Canada, Ontario, least of all Caledonia even owe certain natives "the time of day" when they seem to have forgotten how to look for themselves. I don't blame anyone being pissed about that fact one bit.
"Luckily" we have McGuinty,tazers and pepper spray. Which by the way now are useless as the police said they will not raid the occupants camp again after a previous raid failed, and politicians of the liberal socialist variety feigned horror at the fact violence reared its ugly head and their backbones reverted back to jelly , how nice and touching.
I know how self reliant tax paying residents feel, I lived near Ipperwash and witnessed the total insanity of political correctness, and how the guilty cower behind its perception by those too weak to set the truth free.
Taxpayers and the truth carry the burdon natives have forgotten for its easier to be a pain use your color or your blood line to gain favor, of course it easier to take the time to be a pain when you know a cheques coming that isn't dependent, on your job performance, character, hours worked or personal worth to those that pay you.
The incidents like those at Ipperwash, Oka, and now Caledonia when the victims , those victims of their own stupidity and slothfulness are being the pain and holding communities, land owners, and buisnesses hostage.While government diddy daddles with sugar coated nicety, so natives can find or be handed their worth from somebody other than themselves.While others that know their worth no matter their color, or race while working to forge their own place and worth .Even while living with the setbacks and dishonesty ripe in todays world, and they themselves fall victim to their own stupidity also. The difference being they have learned from their mistakes and even then many never get the respect they have earned by being stand up individuals in this country while moving on productively with a smile on their face , instead of becoming the dead weight many native protesters like to be, while receiving our tax dollars.
Its time to say sorry for your luck, heres your kick at self government, our laws are your laws when it comes to buisness administration, taxes, paying for your legal fees etc etc....... their isn't much room for negotiation but heres the kick at the can you want, just like "everyone else" (mostly everybody) otherwise live with your selfish stupidity, like its nature intends.
All you have to do is try and quit expecting something from the rest of Canada the war of 1812 was long ago, and our veterans that fought in WW 2 get sold short so quit whining start making the change into a nation the earns respect, not searching for it like a whining pup searching for a teat.
I don't owe you anything, my children certainly don't, nor do my neighbours, only the respect you have HONESTLY EARNED no matter your creed, color or religion.
Oh and only the guilty need feel offended.
Update : One could only" hope
" (the perception of the indian problem is false though)
Monday, April 17, 2006
Liberal Repellant
Surfin the net today I think I stumbled on a stop gap measure to get a liberal out of your face: The Moon!
It seems the moon smells like......GUNPOWDER !!
Yes ....that is if the dust from it can be mined, mixed with skunk piss and made to be sprayed like bear repellant.
What a perfect ingredient for a liberal repellant, even if it didn't work it would make a great gag gift, remember those pet rocks?
I know you could also just use the truth, good news about Iraq , a picture of a clubbed seal, or all the bad points about Kyoto, you know the usual but just like swatting a mosquito(that can't stand the sight of blood), it gets laborious after awhile.
It seems the moon smells like......GUNPOWDER !!
Yes ....that is if the dust from it can be mined, mixed with skunk piss and made to be sprayed like bear repellant.
What a perfect ingredient for a liberal repellant, even if it didn't work it would make a great gag gift, remember those pet rocks?
I know you could also just use the truth, good news about Iraq , a picture of a clubbed seal, or all the bad points about Kyoto, you know the usual but just like swatting a mosquito(that can't stand the sight of blood), it gets laborious after awhile.
Wednesday, April 12, 2006
It seems the truth can be clubbed just like a seal
This past Friday while waiting for dump trucks to arrive at the job site, I had the chance to listen to Focus 980 a local call in show hosted by a conservative I usually agree with.
He was having Cathy Kangas as a guest. She was offering the Canadian government 16 million dollars to end the seal hunt.
Mr Wilson the host of the show seem to grow of the opinion Mrs. Kangas wasn’t out to lunch as others at PETA and like organizations usually are. However it didn’t take much time for the listener to hear Kangis and summize though articulate and coming from a different direction she, under the surface differs very little from McCartney and company.
After hearing Kangas not far in, state that there where two victims when it came to the seal hunt one being the fisherman, the other being the seals. That statement in itself is red flag number one. As soon as you hear a person use victim whether its about an animal ,welfare recipient , or a young man turning to crime you know logic is suddenly suspect, and their view that honest human beings that exist amidst certain responsibilities and natural rules are close minded, barbaric, and rather stupid. It also was easy to hear her half hearted but calculated support for the fisherman, who she said where supporting of her offer, something not surprising really as even the best of us will sell out our principles.
True to the left leaning form of your generic animal rights activist she mentioned making the seal hunters park rangers who would inoculate the seals rendering them sterile, however she also mentioned the danger involved in clubbing seals. I guess she fails to see the danger in walking over the same ice floes to inoculate them as clubbing them. Plus a club is not as sharp as a needle.
If anything Kangas was skilled in her ability of deception, and playing both sides of the fence ; a liberal strong point.
Many questioned her views , though praised her persona on the show however she was a snake oil salesmen and a good one at that, she didn’t mention that the 16 million dollars was coming from private donations, and other animal rights activist groups, she seemed content to let it stand that the money was hers? She also seemed to like the fact that the host John Wilson was referring to her point of view as being different and unemotional compared to others that have spoken out against the seal hunt.
I contended that she was good at hiding that emotion, I’m sure she harbours those emotions but knew as the left goes that their hair brained ideals when it comes to the way things are in our natural kingdom usually leads many to view animals rights activists as nuts..... rightly so.
Having heard enough I called in, wishing Kangas no ill will I called her on her bluff , and stated I see no difference between her and McCartney or any other A.R.A other than a good chunk of change, Mr Wilson disagreed with me, however there are realities we all must face in this world and those are if you live something living must die so you do so. You cannot remove yourself from that fact(without dying) , we all kill something to survive though maybe indirectly.
The final nail that signalled to me Kangas was a fraud when it came to objectivity, and a reasonable view on human existence amongst the animal kingdom came when she referred to my call as moot when it came to the right and wrong of killing animals. Her moral relativity , and lack of respect for a wrong and a right leaves me wondering how she than can be for or against the seal hunt when she cannot have the courage to believe in right and wrong when it comes to something she believes in. I asked if she was a member of PETA? She replied “no”, however on getting home from work and doing a search I found she was a member of The Sea Shepards " Certainly she wasn't totally dishonest nor was she totally truthfull she knew what I was digging for it was what she was hiding ; her resemblance in ideals to thiswoman and these organizations and their inability to stand anything they find unpleasent to their sensibilities and their inability to admit that they to are just as much a killer as Joe Blow hunter and trapper, and the only way we stop taking from this planet is when we cease to exsist. Hunters and trappers and those that take reality for what it is, accept that fact nor do they see value in an living organisims extinction no matter how cute it is.
Kangas and company, Paul included are not able to handle that fact and animals will always come before people, and truth and logic. I wonder what their views are when it comes to their lives and livelyhoods.
Cathy you don't fool me.
He was having Cathy Kangas as a guest. She was offering the Canadian government 16 million dollars to end the seal hunt.
Mr Wilson the host of the show seem to grow of the opinion Mrs. Kangas wasn’t out to lunch as others at PETA and like organizations usually are. However it didn’t take much time for the listener to hear Kangis and summize though articulate and coming from a different direction she, under the surface differs very little from McCartney and company.
After hearing Kangas not far in, state that there where two victims when it came to the seal hunt one being the fisherman, the other being the seals. That statement in itself is red flag number one. As soon as you hear a person use victim whether its about an animal ,welfare recipient , or a young man turning to crime you know logic is suddenly suspect, and their view that honest human beings that exist amidst certain responsibilities and natural rules are close minded, barbaric, and rather stupid. It also was easy to hear her half hearted but calculated support for the fisherman, who she said where supporting of her offer, something not surprising really as even the best of us will sell out our principles.
True to the left leaning form of your generic animal rights activist she mentioned making the seal hunters park rangers who would inoculate the seals rendering them sterile, however she also mentioned the danger involved in clubbing seals. I guess she fails to see the danger in walking over the same ice floes to inoculate them as clubbing them. Plus a club is not as sharp as a needle.
If anything Kangas was skilled in her ability of deception, and playing both sides of the fence ; a liberal strong point.
Many questioned her views , though praised her persona on the show however she was a snake oil salesmen and a good one at that, she didn’t mention that the 16 million dollars was coming from private donations, and other animal rights activist groups, she seemed content to let it stand that the money was hers? She also seemed to like the fact that the host John Wilson was referring to her point of view as being different and unemotional compared to others that have spoken out against the seal hunt.
I contended that she was good at hiding that emotion, I’m sure she harbours those emotions but knew as the left goes that their hair brained ideals when it comes to the way things are in our natural kingdom usually leads many to view animals rights activists as nuts..... rightly so.
Having heard enough I called in, wishing Kangas no ill will I called her on her bluff , and stated I see no difference between her and McCartney or any other A.R.A other than a good chunk of change, Mr Wilson disagreed with me, however there are realities we all must face in this world and those are if you live something living must die so you do so. You cannot remove yourself from that fact(without dying) , we all kill something to survive though maybe indirectly.
The final nail that signalled to me Kangas was a fraud when it came to objectivity, and a reasonable view on human existence amongst the animal kingdom came when she referred to my call as moot when it came to the right and wrong of killing animals. Her moral relativity , and lack of respect for a wrong and a right leaves me wondering how she than can be for or against the seal hunt when she cannot have the courage to believe in right and wrong when it comes to something she believes in. I asked if she was a member of PETA? She replied “no”, however on getting home from work and doing a search I found she was a member of The Sea Shepards " Certainly she wasn't totally dishonest nor was she totally truthfull she knew what I was digging for it was what she was hiding ; her resemblance in ideals to thiswoman and these organizations and their inability to stand anything they find unpleasent to their sensibilities and their inability to admit that they to are just as much a killer as Joe Blow hunter and trapper, and the only way we stop taking from this planet is when we cease to exsist. Hunters and trappers and those that take reality for what it is, accept that fact nor do they see value in an living organisims extinction no matter how cute it is.
Kangas and company, Paul included are not able to handle that fact and animals will always come before people, and truth and logic. I wonder what their views are when it comes to their lives and livelyhoods.
Cathy you don't fool me.
Saturday, April 01, 2006
Don't you just love the smell of a revolution in the morning ?
Well here is one group of farmer’s that where not sitting in the local coffee shop “bitching”, and doing nothing but watching things stay the same. One has to respect the backbone of the farmer in question and his neighbours that walked a dangerous line against the police and bureaucrats’. One also has to wonder at the motives of the Canadian Food Inspection Agency, and the egg producers’ board had in raiding his farm, but wouldn’t you think they would have known a visit from the Lanark Landowners Association was a likely event?
I almost think the powers that be namely Mcgiveme would love for the L.L.A to go pound salt and disappear,and one wonders if he isn't testing the rural resolve or trying to break it? Like I have said before governments like his fear citizens like Shawn Carmichael and Mr Hiller, who love the taste freedom can give a person but would like a good feed of it, and realise governments love just giving you little spoonfuls even though it is not theirs to give in the first place.
They demanded respect and I think quite rightly said with their actions“ WHO THE HELL DO YOU THINK YOU ARE” maybe its time other farmers in Ontario quit riding on these kind of honourable actions, quit bitching and do something about it.
Farmers better wake up take heed, even grab a pitchfork and demand some freedom. All rural people not just the people that reside in rural locations, but those that know what the rural self reliant character is all about, should stand together as one and peacefully “SCARE THE SHIT OUT OF THOSE IN GOVERNMENT THAT SEEK TO CONTROL THE FREE MAN”.
Quit crying for money neighbours and demand more respect less regulation. Peacefully tell those like McGiveme that could not give a rat’s ass for “backwards hicks” that vote conservative or have libertarian leanings to “F*ck off” for a change.
This story should be an inspiration to all farmers, business owners, actually anyone that believes in freedom, to stand up.
UPDATE: here is a more detailed recollection of the whole standoff
I almost think the powers that be namely Mcgiveme would love for the L.L.A to go pound salt and disappear,and one wonders if he isn't testing the rural resolve or trying to break it? Like I have said before governments like his fear citizens like Shawn Carmichael and Mr Hiller, who love the taste freedom can give a person but would like a good feed of it, and realise governments love just giving you little spoonfuls even though it is not theirs to give in the first place.
They demanded respect and I think quite rightly said with their actions“ WHO THE HELL DO YOU THINK YOU ARE” maybe its time other farmers in Ontario quit riding on these kind of honourable actions, quit bitching and do something about it.
Farmers better wake up take heed, even grab a pitchfork and demand some freedom. All rural people not just the people that reside in rural locations, but those that know what the rural self reliant character is all about, should stand together as one and peacefully “SCARE THE SHIT OUT OF THOSE IN GOVERNMENT THAT SEEK TO CONTROL THE FREE MAN”.
Quit crying for money neighbours and demand more respect less regulation. Peacefully tell those like McGiveme that could not give a rat’s ass for “backwards hicks” that vote conservative or have libertarian leanings to “F*ck off” for a change.
This story should be an inspiration to all farmers, business owners, actually anyone that believes in freedom, to stand up.
UPDATE: here is a more detailed recollection of the whole standoff
Genuine respect seems to be a conservative quality.
It has been reported under Harper’s watch that flags around our capitol haven’t been lowered to half mast when one of our own has fallen in Afghanistan? They where however lowered to half-mast by the liberals every time a soldier fell except for one?
Is it not our duty as citizens to lower our own “internal flag” when we hear of a soldier’s sacrifice whether it was yesterday or in the conflicts of the past, that at one time helped define who we where as a country? Is it not a small repayment, to stand ready and honour our soldiers, and their commitment to their country? Without the need of a lowered flag?
Do we continually lower our flag for every soldier, or continually keep our awareness of how important our soldiers are and have been to our country and the world? Do we look towards all of our soldiers past and present with equal admiration and thanks daily, or at the very least save a spot in our hearts for their remembrance, and honour them in keeping their worth known in our minds as fighting men that have always fought the good fight?
If it is a duty to lower a flag for the fallen, then all flags in this country should never be raised over half. Why do we need a flag lowered for every life in the present to spike some form of rememberance? Those that have fallen I am sure would rather be respected and honoured as second nature, and have that same respect shown to their fellow troops and families by their government and their fellow citizen’s.
Could it be Canada has a political party that is of the character that has respect for the military, and expects the same from its citizens? Do we finally have a political party that holds the belief that every citizen should be able to recognize the significance of a soldiers sacrifice everyday? After so many years do we have a PM that finds it personally distasteful to patronize a loss common in military service especially in a theatre of war by lowering a symbol shortly? It does not do the deed merit, when the honourable act of a soldier requires so much from those living under the peace and freedom he protected for more than a day. Our character as a country should honesty reflect a soldier’s duty not to die but be honourable, and righteous in the face of adversity and evil.
That I think defines the Canada Harper would like us to be, and many have in their selfishness forgot.
Is it not our duty as citizens to lower our own “internal flag” when we hear of a soldier’s sacrifice whether it was yesterday or in the conflicts of the past, that at one time helped define who we where as a country? Is it not a small repayment, to stand ready and honour our soldiers, and their commitment to their country? Without the need of a lowered flag?
Do we continually lower our flag for every soldier, or continually keep our awareness of how important our soldiers are and have been to our country and the world? Do we look towards all of our soldiers past and present with equal admiration and thanks daily, or at the very least save a spot in our hearts for their remembrance, and honour them in keeping their worth known in our minds as fighting men that have always fought the good fight?
If it is a duty to lower a flag for the fallen, then all flags in this country should never be raised over half. Why do we need a flag lowered for every life in the present to spike some form of rememberance? Those that have fallen I am sure would rather be respected and honoured as second nature, and have that same respect shown to their fellow troops and families by their government and their fellow citizen’s.
Could it be Canada has a political party that is of the character that has respect for the military, and expects the same from its citizens? Do we finally have a political party that holds the belief that every citizen should be able to recognize the significance of a soldiers sacrifice everyday? After so many years do we have a PM that finds it personally distasteful to patronize a loss common in military service especially in a theatre of war by lowering a symbol shortly? It does not do the deed merit, when the honourable act of a soldier requires so much from those living under the peace and freedom he protected for more than a day. Our character as a country should honesty reflect a soldier’s duty not to die but be honourable, and righteous in the face of adversity and evil.
That I think defines the Canada Harper would like us to be, and many have in their selfishness forgot.
Wednesday, March 22, 2006
The difference between a good parent and the best parent
In reading a post tonight from a concerned mother, who is divorced. I couldn'’t help but see the signs of the same syndrome, that seems to me to be one of the many side affects of divorce. Not just prevalent in divorce but more harmful to a child in a family divided by that invisible barrier only the wise take heed of, and learn from.
The mother upon learning of her twelve year old daughter'’s desire to acquire a expensive puppy, tries to impress upon her daughter that her desire is hers alone to fulfill, as in reality we have to gradually wean the little teenage "“ monsters"”. In other words the mother wants her to earn it. However the father has different ideas, he thinks the daughter is too young etc etc.
However the fact remains life dictates our wants can only really be supplied by our own work, our parents pass eventually, and money doesn'’t grow on trees planted by liberals and socialists. In reality in this society our wants directly fall in behind our duties -– taxes, bills a roof over our heads, being parents that pass on more than money.
What better way to foster character and a better grasp of who they are as an individual in a thinking young human being, then have them learn how to work from someone other than family ? They need to learn how it feels to be criticized, scrutinized by a boss who demands value from them without the hug afterwards, and being tired from more than watching Much Music or talking on the phone, and the clincher? Maybe failing; the most scary unpleasant feeling of the whole mix. Maybe they will learn a valuable lesson, and they will mature in more ways than just a birth date?
How could a father or a mother not want their child to grow in a natural way? While certainly being concerned that the hammer life can be doesn'’t make their child the anvil before they develope the mental hardness to take its blows.
The father is just delaying the inevitable, the mother wants to get it over and done with as life is with all certainly waiting to show what it has in store, and we all get to see in no uncertain fashion, how unpleasant some moments can be, and those moments to each and every individual are defining ones no question.
Those lessons, some of the most valuable are lost most easily to children between divorced parents, the arguments in many cases to the children are explained second hand, as they see one side at a time, and unfortunately I fear in most cases one parent takes the easy road and coddles, and "“dutifully"” says what the child wants to hear, just to be revered and thought of fondly or the best - that'’s cheating, and coming from an adult despicable and sad.
We aren'’t perfect , children aren'’t perfect, and life isn'’t perfect and the sooner a child learns to put a smile on their own face from those honourable moments in life that matter most when we really feel our smile, they will be better off. Just as a parent would be better off realizing we aren'’t going to be around forever , and our children can either cheat at life, or take what wisdom we as parents or concerned adults pass on and someday they as adults and parents connect the dots and realise what life is all about, and what duty a parent really has - to pass on lessons with caring and the knowledge that someday their child is going to be called upon to be an adult, and they aren'’t going to be around to protect them.
My greatest reward in life ?– The day my daughters realise why “I was "the sternest bastard in the world"”, because I loved them so much to be anything else and their beauty and value has only grown as they have. I truly believe even with the hardships, the temporary fears of not being a good parent, my daughters have given me more than I will ever be able to repay to them, and it is a disservice to their beauty, character, and honest innocence to shield them at 11 and 14 from what life has in store, good or bad.
In her post the mother talks of her sins. Where is the sin in reality, when it truly exists in denial?
The mother upon learning of her twelve year old daughter'’s desire to acquire a expensive puppy, tries to impress upon her daughter that her desire is hers alone to fulfill, as in reality we have to gradually wean the little teenage "“ monsters"”. In other words the mother wants her to earn it. However the father has different ideas, he thinks the daughter is too young etc etc.
However the fact remains life dictates our wants can only really be supplied by our own work, our parents pass eventually, and money doesn'’t grow on trees planted by liberals and socialists. In reality in this society our wants directly fall in behind our duties -– taxes, bills a roof over our heads, being parents that pass on more than money.
What better way to foster character and a better grasp of who they are as an individual in a thinking young human being, then have them learn how to work from someone other than family ? They need to learn how it feels to be criticized, scrutinized by a boss who demands value from them without the hug afterwards, and being tired from more than watching Much Music or talking on the phone, and the clincher? Maybe failing; the most scary unpleasant feeling of the whole mix. Maybe they will learn a valuable lesson, and they will mature in more ways than just a birth date?
How could a father or a mother not want their child to grow in a natural way? While certainly being concerned that the hammer life can be doesn'’t make their child the anvil before they develope the mental hardness to take its blows.
The father is just delaying the inevitable, the mother wants to get it over and done with as life is with all certainly waiting to show what it has in store, and we all get to see in no uncertain fashion, how unpleasant some moments can be, and those moments to each and every individual are defining ones no question.
Those lessons, some of the most valuable are lost most easily to children between divorced parents, the arguments in many cases to the children are explained second hand, as they see one side at a time, and unfortunately I fear in most cases one parent takes the easy road and coddles, and "“dutifully"” says what the child wants to hear, just to be revered and thought of fondly or the best - that'’s cheating, and coming from an adult despicable and sad.
We aren'’t perfect , children aren'’t perfect, and life isn'’t perfect and the sooner a child learns to put a smile on their own face from those honourable moments in life that matter most when we really feel our smile, they will be better off. Just as a parent would be better off realizing we aren'’t going to be around forever , and our children can either cheat at life, or take what wisdom we as parents or concerned adults pass on and someday they as adults and parents connect the dots and realise what life is all about, and what duty a parent really has - to pass on lessons with caring and the knowledge that someday their child is going to be called upon to be an adult, and they aren'’t going to be around to protect them.
My greatest reward in life ?– The day my daughters realise why “I was "the sternest bastard in the world"”, because I loved them so much to be anything else and their beauty and value has only grown as they have. I truly believe even with the hardships, the temporary fears of not being a good parent, my daughters have given me more than I will ever be able to repay to them, and it is a disservice to their beauty, character, and honest innocence to shield them at 11 and 14 from what life has in store, good or bad.
In her post the mother talks of her sins. Where is the sin in reality, when it truly exists in denial?
Tuesday, March 21, 2006
It's nice to be noticed
I have a thank you to put out there for Kate at Small Dead Animals, she took the time to link to me - and today my page views are up 365% (my free service stops at 1000 page views per day), too bad it wasn't because of something I wrote :). I really appreciate the time she takes to produce her blog, go thru all her emails, yet get on with her seemingly busy life. I find it hard and I'm surely not as busy, of course I'm an amateur when it comes to blogging, even writing.
I'm just saying thanks to Kate for her time.
She seems like a salt of the earth gal - but then most conservative women are.
I'm just saying thanks to Kate for her time.
She seems like a salt of the earth gal - but then most conservative women are.
Monday, March 13, 2006
Where are the left's balls?
You know I once told someone who had their undies in a knot over America and Iraq that they should not get so upset. Once democracy takes hold there as it has, and time goes by soon Iraq will have a divorce rate the same as ours is today, feminism will be in full swing and all of our other little bad habits when it comes to culture will be apparent, it’s just a side affect of “progressiveness” and politics.
So Jack what do you want your all for change? It seems to me you should be supporting our troops that are trying to bring a change for the better to another war torn society.
Your all for human rites at “all” costs, progressive ideals propelled out into society without much thought or concern?
Yet when soldiers that represent a modern country Iike Canada, put themselves in harms way, and inevitably bad things start to happen. We lose boys, and the realisation that the world can be a pretty barbaric place hits close to home, the left recoils blames the “evil”
Americans and wants to bring the boys home.
Our soldiers always fought the good fight, but somehow under the left the feeling was lost. It was like a father sending off a son he could really give a rats ass for. Nice to see there is some genuine concern by our government for our men and women in uniform that are trained to kill the bad guys, and help those that can’t help themselves.
I can't pretend to say what we should do with the troops in Afghanistan. For one I’m not a parent of a soldier, and have never served in the military. However if our men and women want to be there, feel they are making the lives of the good people there better, and killing the bad ones. I’ll proudly support them being there, just like our new PM ; with a longed for lump of pride for my country in my throat.
God Bless the soldiers in harms way and their families, and may Canada find some of its fortitude we have always had but have lost along the way.
So Jack what do you want your all for change? It seems to me you should be supporting our troops that are trying to bring a change for the better to another war torn society.
Your all for human rites at “all” costs, progressive ideals propelled out into society without much thought or concern?
Yet when soldiers that represent a modern country Iike Canada, put themselves in harms way, and inevitably bad things start to happen. We lose boys, and the realisation that the world can be a pretty barbaric place hits close to home, the left recoils blames the “evil”
Americans and wants to bring the boys home.
Our soldiers always fought the good fight, but somehow under the left the feeling was lost. It was like a father sending off a son he could really give a rats ass for. Nice to see there is some genuine concern by our government for our men and women in uniform that are trained to kill the bad guys, and help those that can’t help themselves.
I can't pretend to say what we should do with the troops in Afghanistan. For one I’m not a parent of a soldier, and have never served in the military. However if our men and women want to be there, feel they are making the lives of the good people there better, and killing the bad ones. I’ll proudly support them being there, just like our new PM ; with a longed for lump of pride for my country in my throat.
God Bless the soldiers in harms way and their families, and may Canada find some of its fortitude we have always had but have lost along the way.
Sunday, March 05, 2006
Its a small world
Reading the local newspaper this week I was surprised to find some encouraging news that could help suggest Stephen Harper hasn't lost touch with the common man, and intends to keep with his promises.I found it even more surprising that it came from a good friend of mine I attended public and high school with. I took the liberty of scanning the paper and posting the article.
Wednesday, March 01, 2006
McGuinty - Does he want a medal or a chest to pin it on?
If you can imagine being back in public school at recess listening to the classic whiney tattletale voice his disdain over some perceived unfairness to the nearest teacher.It wouldn't be hard to see the similarities between Dalton Mcguinty and that one annoying brat we all remember.
Alberta proposes giving people that can pay the choice to get the care they need privately and Ontario's liberal premier screams blue murder, and seems to think that won't be Ontarios way.
Of course Dalton being the model liberal would rather just nailthose that work, with a claw back at tax time. Notice freedom of choice when it comes to your health isn't part of "McGiveme's" governing style. There is one choice he recognizes though and supports, the ability for an Ontarian to not work, whine about being a victim well collecting welfare, and getting off scott free when it comes to paying for the services they use, and being considered equal . They are no doubt behind McGuinty and his whining 100 % I'm sure.
McGuinty's disapproval of Alberta's plan should be met with a big meaty middle finger from those in Canada that like to have choice when it comes to themselves and their families welfare. I like politicians that have the fortitude to give the citizen's they represent a choice McGuinty and those that voted him in are still looking for theirs.
The biggest problem with McGuinty is hes full of the brown stuff, yet thinks he knows best.
Maybe he should stop governing like Toronto is all of Ontario, and worry about freedom of choice in his own province before he starts telling others what to do.
Alberta proposes giving people that can pay the choice to get the care they need privately and Ontario's liberal premier screams blue murder, and seems to think that won't be Ontarios way.
Of course Dalton being the model liberal would rather just nailthose that work, with a claw back at tax time. Notice freedom of choice when it comes to your health isn't part of "McGiveme's" governing style. There is one choice he recognizes though and supports, the ability for an Ontarian to not work, whine about being a victim well collecting welfare, and getting off scott free when it comes to paying for the services they use, and being considered equal . They are no doubt behind McGuinty and his whining 100 % I'm sure.
McGuinty's disapproval of Alberta's plan should be met with a big meaty middle finger from those in Canada that like to have choice when it comes to themselves and their families welfare. I like politicians that have the fortitude to give the citizen's they represent a choice McGuinty and those that voted him in are still looking for theirs.
The biggest problem with McGuinty is hes full of the brown stuff, yet thinks he knows best.
Maybe he should stop governing like Toronto is all of Ontario, and worry about freedom of choice in his own province before he starts telling others what to do.
Monday, February 20, 2006
Theres more to the story than a Conservative that says the F word
It seems lately when it comes to the local inquiry into the shooting of Dudley George all we seem to hear is how the premier at the time ( Mike Harris) was to blame, for the violent and tragic outcome at the occupied provincial park. Before I go farther, it does seem the Army Camp lands should have been returned to the Stoney Point natives long ago . This may have saved a tragic death, and a 15 million dollar inquiry into why it happened. However one could easily wonder if demands from some natives will ever end. Common sense would dictate an illegal takeover of a provincial park would bring grief upon any common man, however today's political correctness and the appeasement that follows minorities (most of the time) may lead some of them to believe they are above the law.
Reading MPP Marcel Beaubien's testimony refreshes ones memory when it comes to the comments and feelings of friends and acquaintances that where floating around at the time of the take over. Not all events leading up to the gunfire filled night of Sept 6 1995 where the "white mans" problem, and I sincerely hope 15 million dollars worth of testimony doesn't end in a one sided exercise in appeasement, and an excuse for anarchy.
I have to give Marcel credit he told it like it was, and if anyone wonders why many people here have little sympathy for the native cause, these are a few of the reasons :
(Taken from the transcripts)
(Lawyer) Q: And perhaps you could tell us if you
12 could, describe where the -- the piece of property or the
13 lands in question were located relative to the Park and
14 the Army Camp?
15 (Marcel) A: Well, it would be -- it's located
16 west of -- of the Army Camp but closer to the Kettle
17 Stony --
18 Q: Point Reserve?
19 A: That's right, yeah.
20 Q: All right. And how did this matter
21 come to your attention as a member of Provincial
22 Parliament?
23 A: Well, like I said it was brought to
24 my attention by friends and they were very frustrated
25 also and -- and I shared their -- their concern and
281
1 their frustration because some of them, I don't know,
2 some of them lived there for a number of years.
3 They had -- they thought they had a clear
4 title to their land and I'm sure when they purchased the
5 property that they had paid the land transfer tax. And I
6 thought in Ontario that once you had a clear deed to your
7 property that you should be able to enjoy that property
8 and these people were not able to do that.
9 And I felt that the Provincial Government
10 had some type of responsibility to help these people in
11 defraying some of the costs. There were some tremendous
12 amount of legal costs involved with that which they
13 pocketed themselves.
14 And I think we all have to look at ourself
15 and ask each -- each one of us has to ask the question:
16 If I were in their boat or in their situation how would I
17 feel, especially when I have a piece of paper that tells
18 me that I've got a legal deed to my property? I paid all
19 the taxes and somebody comes along and says, No. And the
20 Province is sitting on the sideline doing nothing.
21 So, it was a -- you know I could -- I
22 could see why the people are frustrated with that
23 particular situation.
24 Q: All right. And just so that we're
25 all familiar with what you're speaking of do -- do -- can
282
1 you just tell us firstly who you understood the parties
2 to this dispute to be and what the dispute was about so
3 far as you understood it?
4 A: Well, as far as I understood it
5 apparently the -- you know again, you know I'm going back
6 and I haven't refreshed but I -- I think the -- the suit
7 was somewhat unique because as opposed to having a land
8 claim on that property each individual property owner was
9 being sued by the natives which --
10 Q: By which organization?
11 A: Pardon?
12 Q: By -- by whom were they --
13 A: By the natives. By the --
14 Q: Can you be more specific?
15 A: The Kettle Stony.
16 Q: The First Nation?
17 A: That's right, yeah.
18 Q: All right.
19 A: And so it certainly presented an
20 interesting twist because it was not your typical land
21 claim and so consequently people were left to themselves
22 to -- and they had to fend for themself also, you know,
23 financially and legally and everything
Q: And can you tell us in -- in general
5 what those concerns were that were being conveyed to you
6 as MPP?
7 A: Well aside from the -- the claim,
8 there was no doubt that there was some intimidation,
9 some harassment, some break-ins, people were being threatened
10 in some cases.
11 And these are the complaints that, you
12 know, that I was fielding from the constituents.
13 Q: All right. And did they tell you who
14 -- who they believed were causing the intimidation and
15 the other acts you -- you've indicated?
16 A: Yeah. In -- in this case the finger
17 was pointed at -- at the Natives.
18 Q: And any particular group?
19 A: Well that fluctuated because some of
20 them were familiar to the people that lived there but
21 others they weren't -- you know, they didn't know who
22 they were. They were new faces.
23 Q: All right. And did the constituents
24 draw a link between this activity and the West Ipperwash
25 litigation?
285
1 A: Well I think some people alluded to
2 the fact that, you know, maybe it was part and parcel but
3 I, you know, I'm only going by what the people were
4 telling me. I don't know. Like I said I don't live in
5 the area so it's something that I did not certainly
6 experience myself.
I went to one of the landowner meetings at a local Arena I didn't own land in West Ipperwash but I certainly sympathized with the residents that worked hard and payed taxes, just to have one land claim ruin their peaceful lives and many of those people where retired it was sad to see the despair and helplessness on many landowners faces, hard work and being responsible citizens certainly earned them more respect from both the federal and provincial governments.
A letter from one of the residents taken from the transcripts.
"I retired from teaching in June of
14 1991, continued to work until she was
15 diagnosed with stomach cancer in June
16 of 1992. We made our house at West
17 Ipperwash beach our principle residence
18 during the summer of 1992.
19 We were served with a papers for the
20 land claim of the Chippewa of Kettle
21 and Stony in December of 1992."
Comments on the matter from Marcel :
4 for most people, home ownership is the largest investment
5 that they make.
6 And if you're like this person here,
7 basically retired, probably on a fixed income and all of
8 a sudden your largest investment that you work a whole
9 lifetime is being challenged, I would strongly suggest to
10 everyone in this audience here today, that it would
11 create some increase of stress level, I would think.
Also some enlightening comments from Marcel taken from his letter to the Attorney General:
"Tensions have again escalated over
13 this past weekend and my constituents
14 have the following concerns."
15 And then we talk about the costs involved
16 with the civil action:
3. That the residents are faced with a
21 situation whereby they cannot sell
22 their properties because of the legal
23 action taken
4. That residents have to pay property
25 taxes while the ownership of their
1 property is in the hands of the Court
2 system."
6. There's a lot of intimidation going on
10 at the moment and the residents feel
11 threatened."
12 Again, this is what I'm passing on from
13 what I'm hearing from the residents
According to the residents:
15 "Law enforcement is basically non
16 existent and the OPP does not seem too
17 keen in getting involved."
18 And lastly:
19 "Residents are stressed out and this
20 situation is becoming unbearable."
Well this may not directly have anything to do with the shooting of Dudley George it certain shows why sympathy towards natives in this area, rightly so is lacking.
The property owners finally won Aug 18, 1995.
Camp Ipperwash and a few comments from Marcel pertaining to the area, and the attitudes of residents leading up to Sept 6
Q:(Lawyer) Now, you indicated that prior to your
11 election as MPP, you were aware that there was a dispute
12 involving the local Aboriginal people concerning the Army
13 Base, the Military Base, Camp Ipperwash.
Q : All right. And did you receive any
24 inquiries or communications from your constituents
25 relative to Camp Ipperwash and this dispute?
(Marcel) Well, yeah, I did -- the subject
5 matter was raised because, again, I think a lot of people
6 in the area felt that a lot of the harassment, the
7 intimidation, the break-ins, were people that live in the
8 Army Base area.
For instance, at night, along the Army
4 Camp Base, high powered flashlights would be flashed in
5 people's homes at night, not only for seconds but for
6 long periods of time where, you know, keep them from
7 sleeping.
8 So, you know, there were certainly some
9 illegal or not legal activities going on in the area
A: Well, I think generally speaking, I
3 think people were concerned first of all part of the Base
4 had been occupied a couple years prior to this and now
5 the entire Base had been taken over and I think the
6 concern was, okay what's next.
Q (Lawyer): And -- and what was the context for
22 that discussion concerning the policing of the Base?
23 A: Well, I was receiving a lot of
24 complaints from area residents that if there was an
25 occurrence that the police would be chasing the
1 individuals and as soon as they got to the Army Base gate
2 that the police chase would stop there.
3 And that created an awful lot of
4 frustration with the people because they felt that the
5 law was not being upheld. And it was just like living in
6 a third world that all of a sudden you got to this area
7 and nothing happens.
A: Well, yeah. And to pass on the --
11 the concerns that I was receiving from my constituents
12 because I felt it was important. You -- you know, we got
13 realize that, you know, this is not 2005 it was 1995, and
14 the situation was pretty tense in the area.
15 I mean, you know, the -- the area is
16 crawling with police. I'm sure there was all kinds of
17 intelligence going on. People were living in fear.
18 People were being intimidated. People were being
19 harassed. People were being chased on the beach.
20 So, it was not a beach -- what you would
21 call a nice Sunday afternoon beach party. So, the area
22 was quite tense and --
A: So, that I can relay back to my
8 constituents. Because you got to -- you -- you must
9 realize that by this time, there's probably a -- you
10 know, calls are coming by -- probably a hundred (100)
11 calls a day coming into the constituency office.
12 Not that I mind the calls, but people are
13 asking for -- for answers and I don't really have
14 anything to give them. And I personally feel that
15 somebody somewhere must have something to give me so that
16 I can pass it on.
A: Well, I'll stand by what I wrote down
2 and I'll read it for the record. It says:
3 "Boaters came ashore for a picnic.
4 Natives pulled in on beach, pulled
5 umbrellas out and coolers and put them
6 in their car, in their car trunks.
7 Confrontation occurred between the
8 Natives and families on beach. Young
9 children were present. Natives threw
10 bottles at the boat and apparently one
11 native pointed a gun at one of the
12 boaters."
13 And that was on August the 20th, 1995, and
14 that's relayed to me by Mr. Williams.
Q:(Lawyer) All right. I see in the third
14 paragraph that this constituent is -- appears to be
15 characterizing the occupiers as hooligans. Was that your
16 interpretation?
17 A: Well, like I said again this morning,
18 some people were referring to them as terrorists, others
19 as hooligans, animals or thugs, so there was different
20 words used, I don't know which one is the proper one.
Them - being natives causing trouble
A: Well, at that particular point in
17 time, we probably talk also about constituents --
18 constituents arming themselves and I certainly didn't
19 want to see that, and I'm sure Inspector Carson did want
20 to see that. And so whether that relates to that, I
21 don't know.
22 Q: Well that --
23 A: Because there was talk, I mean, and I
24 showed evidence, letters, that we received that people
25 were willing -- and phone calls, that people were -- were
1 willing to arm themselves
Marcel pretty well sums up the situation around Ipperwash at the time and today probably still exists just in lower doses.
1 part:
2 "It appears that over the last few
3 years all levels of government have
4 adopted a non confrontational approach
5 when faced with Natives undertaking
6 illegal acts to enforce claims or air
7 grievances. This must stop. Each time
8 Natives or any other identifiable group
9 are seen to make gains through illegal
10 means with no punishment, three (3)
11 things happen.
12 The first is that the public perceives
13 members of the group have special
14 status of the laws that supposedly bind
15 all of us equally and are there to
16 ensure the peaceful co-existence of our
17 society have exceptions. The group is
18 above the law.
19 The second is that the public begins to
20 resent those who have the perceived --
21 who have the perceived special status.
22 Why can that group get away with
23 something we cannot? The public will
24 then react strongly against any group
25 member, rightly or wrongly.
1 This -- this certainly does not lend
2 itself to peaceful co-existence.
3 [Sorry]
4 The activities of a small group of
5 Natives could affect the treatment of
6 Natives across the country. Attitudes
7 will harden into a them versus us
8 mentality and solutions to problems
9 will be much harder to achieve.
10 The third consequence is that overall
11 respect for the law diminishes. There
12 is no such thing as a right without a
13 remedy, neither is there a law without
14 enforcement. If illegal acts are
15 tolerated they spread. The end result
16 is anarchy. People begin to perceive
17 the Government cannot protect them and
18 their interests. They begin to take
19 steps to protect themselves. These
20 steps can lead to tragic consequences.
21 If governments will not enforce the law
22 citizens through elected officials have
23 seen fit to live by, respect for the
24 Government and those who comprise it is
25 -- is lost."
Its funny how thw MSM skips over the comments I mentioned above. I haven't had the time to search for more goodies but I will . Socialists tend to blindly sympathize with those natives that cause these disturbances, as well as turn their heads when their "brothers" harass their white tax paying neighbor's. I'm betting they wouldn't be so sympathetic if it was their land and home under the gun, but then being hypocritical is their M.O. isn't it?
I'm not trying to generalize .Any color of people have the good and bad, so only the guilty need be offended.
Its a real shame 15 million dollars is being spent on BS, when something had to give ; It did and a native unfortunately died.
People thoughts in Forest Ont(home of the inquiry) and surrounding area will not change due to the inquiry, its just more of the same old same old socialist drivel.
Many are wondering when will this ever end, and will our children have to pick up our native neighbours tabs long after their parents are gone?
We need more politicians that say shit when they have a mouth full, and stick by their constituents like Marcel did, their story needed to be told.
The natives well its time to move on, and pick yourselves up.
Full transcript of Marcels's Jan 18 testimony here Jan 19 here, and the inquiry web page here
Sunday, February 19, 2006
Your Kidneys Please.
Its just so nice to read the some politicians even know where OUR body parts should wind up.
Where the hell do they get off ?
To be honest I don't have a clue what my donor status is, but if this bill passes, I'll be sure to decline my intent to donate. Freedom of choice sure seems to suffer when "John and Jane Do Good" come up with hair brained ideas to make life so much more unrealistic. Sure it sucks sitting their waiting for an organ transplant, but I wonder what right does someone have to my "stolen" body part. I can hear it now "Your dead what do you need it for ?" I don't, but why let some slimy bureaucrat violate my body and determine my wishes, so he or she can feel like they are worth something.
Its bad enough we are expected to be good little sheep and BAAAAAAAA when instructed. Now politicians think we are obliged to give up an organ or two, just because they know what's best.
Yes you can decline,if you remember to notify the bureaucracy, otherwise your an organ donor.
What's next legislating a vitamin program and diet for every Ontarian, so our organs are healthy,and able to be donated.
Far fetched? Not if we are willing to be treated as livestock by idiots.
Where the hell do they get off ?
To be honest I don't have a clue what my donor status is, but if this bill passes, I'll be sure to decline my intent to donate. Freedom of choice sure seems to suffer when "John and Jane Do Good" come up with hair brained ideas to make life so much more unrealistic. Sure it sucks sitting their waiting for an organ transplant, but I wonder what right does someone have to my "stolen" body part. I can hear it now "Your dead what do you need it for ?" I don't, but why let some slimy bureaucrat violate my body and determine my wishes, so he or she can feel like they are worth something.
Its bad enough we are expected to be good little sheep and BAAAAAAAA when instructed. Now politicians think we are obliged to give up an organ or two, just because they know what's best.
Yes you can decline,if you remember to notify the bureaucracy, otherwise your an organ donor.
What's next legislating a vitamin program and diet for every Ontarian, so our organs are healthy,and able to be donated.
Far fetched? Not if we are willing to be treated as livestock by idiots.
Monday, February 13, 2006
They do exist :
A fine example of a conservative woman.
Shes:
1. Smart
2. Witty
3. Strong.
4. Not a victim card in sight.
5. Loves men - and more than capable of monogamy.
6. Wears the pants without wearing them.
7. Can talk about politics
8. Wants to shoot a gun.
9. Graceful (most of the time)
10.Loves the simple things
Like me
Happy Valentines Allison
Love Scott
One one thousand one..One one thousand two.....
Well I’m already bored with all the doom and gloom, floating around about Harper and his ethics. We have had the first wave of “shock” applied to our senses; many have beaten it to death. Let’s hope a good dose of awe is in the wings waiting to dispel the fear of those holding their white flags, and give others that are holding out for the “enlightenment” a reason to burn theirs.
Here are a couple of jabs from the left -
Manley joked that ‘‘every once in a while we have to let the Tories take over so that Canadians remember just how good a Liberal government is.
Eizenga said Harper has demonstrated that he ‘‘can’t be trusted’’ to deliver on his promises. That’s from the Liberal party president and sounds a lot like some of the conservatives that where fit to be tied last week.
From this article ;
Liberals hoping for quick comeback
Maybe that helps remind some conservatives who the real enemy is, and they aren’t on our side of the wire. The liberals are still moving and it isn’t just involuntary muscle spasms. They need a few more sharp political taps across the bridge of their nose, and those carrying the stick shouldn’t be squeamish.
Here are a couple of jabs from the left -
Manley joked that ‘‘every once in a while we have to let the Tories take over so that Canadians remember just how good a Liberal government is.
Eizenga said Harper has demonstrated that he ‘‘can’t be trusted’’ to deliver on his promises. That’s from the Liberal party president and sounds a lot like some of the conservatives that where fit to be tied last week.
From this article ;
Liberals hoping for quick comeback
Maybe that helps remind some conservatives who the real enemy is, and they aren’t on our side of the wire. The liberals are still moving and it isn’t just involuntary muscle spasms. They need a few more sharp political taps across the bridge of their nose, and those carrying the stick shouldn’t be squeamish.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
